OR
TONIGHT'S class, for those of you not in attendance, brought a guest visitor: Kevin McCollister. His images brought a mixture of emotions. The variety of portraits and other scenes from the city only reasserted what I found to be his most compelling words: LA seems to be one of two things, “raw or cooked.” Before he even began to explain, images began forming in my mind. Raw = no effort, no makeup, no money, no designer handbags, no designer jeans. Cooked = Hollywood , video cameras, editing equipment, touch-ups. There is certainly a divide in people’s interests here, yet why are there not more magazines with all of these “raw” images if so many people seem to be interested in it, like I feel (at least I think I feel) so many of us were with Kevin’s images this evening? Why do we still feel the urge to buy a Glamour magazine rather than one located perhaps on the bottom shelf of a newsstand, one that would most certainly project these untouched images that would send us “ooohing” and “aahing” instead of photo shopped pictures of Olivia Wilde throughout the pages of Cosmopolitan.
--Katie Mollica
Photos:
http://beverlyhillshoneys.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Olivia-Wilde-Cosmopolitan-april-2011-Magazine.jpg
Kevin McCollister - http://eastofwestla.com/
nice meditation, katie. and i do think it takes a little more digging to really see "the raw" not because it isn't there -- it's truly all around us -- but because "the cooked" screams for the spotlight -- our eyes are so trained on it. thanks for considering kevin's tossed out metaphor and going deep with it.
ReplyDeleteI really felt connected to Kevin's photography - although I am not a native Angeleno, quite the opposite being a native northerner, I felt console in the realistic, very EAST of West LA images...VERY far from West. I want to point anyone interested to a friend of mine, Raul Guerrero, also from the Bay Area, who has recently done some amazing work. Give him a once over: http://www.Raul-Guerrero.com/#!__page-0
ReplyDelete